There is nothing wrong with that. Some leases have been in place at regular intervals for years. You don`t need to give tenants a new fixed term or a new extension. However, what is the written clause in the letter of confirmation of the exercise lease, according to which “the lessor is still required to give a two-month notice in writing.” This letter was published after the 2-month deadline stated in the original S21 release expired. Will that be taken into consideration once the officer has decided to continue to consider the matter? Thank you Zad ” By this contract, the owner (X) appoints a person to take over the lease of the premises for at least an initial minimum term (or “term”). The landlord and (X) hope that after this minimum period, such a tenant wishes to continue in the crew and renew the rental, and as described below, (X) will attempt to preserve this continued employment. IN FAT…… The lessor agrees to pay (X) a commission for his services for which commissions must be paid, not only in relation to the initial minimum term, but also for each renewed tenancy and if (X) participated in or contributed to such an extension” The rules on rent increases are very different for the two types of periodic rents. If your agreement is something like “pay while tenants are established by brokers in the property” or “pay for the duration of it and any other subsequent rent with the tenant,” then you must pay. I have a reminder that payment was found indefinitely for tenants as an unfair term. I think that could have been the case if he had extended beyond two years; if so, then this may be a cynical attempt by the agent to circumvent the finding (they make a new contract and the 2 years start again).
Landlords are often angry when tenants have moved without informing them. Sometimes they may even include in their tenancy agreement a clause that requires the tenant to terminate his application if he wants to leave at the end of the fixed term and provides for him the payment of a “rent instead of a termination” if they do not. Many leases do not contain any clause defining how the lease will be pursued after the end of the fixed term. However, if the lease was silent on this matter, it would effectively become a “periodic lease,” and the disclosure requested by the tenant would be independent of the “period”, usually monthly, so a month`s notice would be all that a tenant must give. We are not seeing the house on an auction property purchased with a seated tenant, having made a leap of faith. To present us as a new owner, the house in a terrible state bags of garbage everywhere did not look like the real kitchen, as if it had not been touched since 1930. The tenant paid the rent to a large real estate company that obviously never visited, the rent is under rent for the neighborhood, but he always pays a good thing, we are not sure of our rights when it comes to his rent, as it is called a Periodic Tenancy Service, it was a lease that went from his father to his mother and now to him. Any clarity in this matter would be useful for a gathering.
We want to be a good landlord and we don`t want a tenant to live in misery, because it is our responsibility to update the property and become expensive. The terms of a legal term lease are identical to those of the previous insured`s short-term lease. An exception is that the new periodic lease takes place from one period to the next, usually weekly or monthly. Simon, I`m glad you took the time to react. Who legal currently study all the documents and communication that makes exactly the same points of you.